What significant change occurred in governance with the New Federalism approach?

Prepare for the Georgia Constitution Test with engaging flashcards and thought-provoking questions. Access detailed explanations to boost your knowledge. Get exam-ready!

The New Federalism approach is characterized by a shift in governance that emphasizes greater power and autonomy for state governments, particularly in the administration of domestic programs. This movement arose in response to the perceived overreach of the federal government in various policy areas, and it aimed to decentralize authority, allowing states to have a more prominent role in making decisions that affect their residents.

By increasing state control over domestic programs, New Federalism seeks to tailor solutions to local needs and contexts instead of relying solely on federal mandates, which might not consider unique state circumstances. The rationale is that state and local governments are often better positioned to address specific issues due to their proximity to the problems and populations they serve.

In this context, the other choices do not align with the principles of New Federalism. For example, decreasing local government influence contradicts the movement's goal of empowering local decision-making. Similarly, enhancing federal oversight and completely eliminating federal programs does not reflect the New Federalism stance, which encourages the delegation of power rather than removing it entirely from the federal level.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy